Originally Posted by RayF
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
As is the germ theory of disease still a theory. In science, theory doesn't mean hunch. It means it explains much and has withstood the rigors of challenge over many years, and is therefore likely an accurate model. The longer is survives challenge, the more certain we can be of its correctness.

I don’t see how the “It’s not just a theory” claim applies. Nobody is challenging it as being less than a scientific theory. But the opposite is true, as well. It is no greater than a theory, either. Regardless of what can be said….regardless of debate skill, regardless of how long it survives (as a theory), scientifically, the Theory of Evolution is not a fact.

I get it: People feel strongly about it. They’ve read about it. They’ve studied the available evidence. They have their references. In their hearts, they know it’s true.

Its still not an established fact. Faith is required.
Do you accept:
"The Theory of Reletivity" as fact?
"Germ Theory" as fact?
"Cell Theory" as fact?
"Atomic Theory" as fact?
"The Theory of Plate Tectonics" as fact.

The word "theory" is used in conjunction with Evolution just as it is in discussion of disease causing organisms and contagions.


People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.