Originally Posted by RayF
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It has been mentioned that "the theory of evolution" is a controversial subject. It is only controversial to one who enters the discussion with pre-concieved notions which make it impossible to recognize the validity of facts.
An interesting opinion, but that suggests agnostics that challenge the Theory of Evolution have preconceived notions. I believe we can all agree that is more than unlikely.

Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Religion does that to many a person. When your religion makes it impossible to accept natural laws and observable facts........perhaps it is time to question your religion.
Does this apply when that religion is a perverted version of science in which accepted terms, definitions and explanations are contorted to explain a belief?

Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
No dinosaurs have ever been found above the K-T boundary line, nor have large mammals been found below the line.

Barring evolution, how does one explain the proliferation of mammalian species up to and including man over the last 66 million years?

Or do you deny the very existence of a period when reptiles dominated the Earth, and their extinction 66 million years ago?

Have you an answer for the part you ignored?

People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.