That's embarrassing. Historians have uncovered a memorandum in 1390 by Bishop Pierre d'Arcis, stating that the shroud was a fraud and he even knew the artist and how the shroud was painted. Odd that scripture would also omit mention of such an important "historical" piece of "evidence". Irrespective, a blood stained cloth would not prove a resurrection.
These days we have bleeding Mary statues - the miracles continue (well, after someone refills the statues anyway).
Well, this has surfaced before.
I note that you seem to take the “memo” to be legit.
The document you are referring to is unsigned, undated and certainly not corroborated by other outside and independent historians. Perhaps not even written by old Pierre…..bogus, yet you put some stock in it.
Would you have us believe this document should be taken with some degree of seriousness?
The gospels have much more corroboration than this……
