That's embarrassing. Historians have uncovered a memorandum in 1390 by Bishop Pierre d'Arcis, stating that the shroud was a fraud and he even knew the artist and how the shroud was painted. Odd that scripture would also omit mention of such an important "historical" piece of "evidence". Irrespective, a blood stained cloth would not prove a resurrection.
It's not paint and there's not an artist out there that has been able to reproduce it.
Never said it was paint. You can paint with various fluids.
Of course it can be easily reproduced, just not by removing a corpse from a cross and placing it on a sheet.
The original fake looks nothing like Jesus anyway:
