Originally Posted by gemby58
My buddy that's a trustee said when a case gets reopen they go through everything with a fine tooth comb, they more likey will call other party's to help with the search, 99.9% of the time it's not good for the party or should I say Mark and Sherri. Me thinks there both up the creek without a paddle.


Karma.

They filed for bankruptcy, the legal way to discharge their debt. If Mark and Sherri really were "good" Christians, wouldn't they have felt some guilt, some remorse, for the damage that they were causing to their creditors? Did they? Apparently not, since they appear to have hidden assets and went on a spending spree immediately after the bankruptcy was discharged. Not only that, but they came onto this site and arrogantly crowed about Sherri's new Harley.

And, it isn't as if Mark has a sterling record. As has previously been pointed out, Mark was sanctioned by Oregon in 2011. The Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services, Insurance Division, made a sanctioning decision and the actual decision document reads, in part, the following:

"The director proposed to take that action because the director had reason to believe that the party violated (1) Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 836-080-0090 in three instances by recommending that a person who resided in Oregon purchase an annuity that was unsuitable for the person, (2) ORS 746.100 in two instances by making a false or fraudulent statement or representation on or relative to an application for insurance, and (3) ORS 731.296 in three instances by failing to promptly or truthfully respond to an inquiry from the director.

On 7/21/10, the director received from the party a written request for a hearing.

On 8/3/10, the director referred the request to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) to schedule and conduct a hearing.
OAH conducted a hearing on 1/25/11, 1/26/11, 2/16/11, 2/18/11, and 3/30/11.

On 6/28/11, OAH issued a proposed order concluding that the party engaged in most of the misconduct described in the notice of proposed action, and recommending that the director revoke the party’s license which had expired on 5/31/11."

Karma.