Originally Posted by 260Remguy
Originally Posted by gemby58
My buddy that's a trustee said when a case gets reopen they go through everything with a fine tooth comb, they more likey will call other party's to help with the search, 99.9% of the time it's not good for the party or should I say Mark and Sherri. Me thinks there both up the creek without a paddle.


Karma.

They filed for bankruptcy, the legal way to discharge their debt. If Mark and Sherri really were "good" Christians, wouldn't they have felt some guilt, some remorse, for the damage that they were causing to their creditors? Did they? Apparently not, since they appear to have hidden assets and went on a spending spree immediately after the bankruptcy was discharged. Not only that, but they came onto this site and arrogantly crowed about Sherri's new Harley.

And, it isn't as if Mark has a sterling record. As has previously been pointed out, Mark was sanctioned by Oregon in 2011. The Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services, Insurance Division, made a sanctioning decision and the actual decision document reads, in part, the following:

"The director proposed to take that action because the director had reason to believe that the party violated (1) Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 836-080-0090 in three instances by recommending that a person who resided in Oregon purchase an annuity that was unsuitable for the person, (2) ORS 746.100 in two instances by making a false or fraudulent statement or representation on or relative to an application for insurance, and (3) ORS 731.296 in three instances by failing to promptly or truthfully respond to an inquiry from the director.

On 7/21/10, the director received from the party a written request for a hearing.

On 8/3/10, the director referred the request to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) to schedule and conduct a hearing.
OAH conducted a hearing on 1/25/11, 1/26/11, 2/16/11, 2/18/11, and 3/30/11.

On 6/28/11, OAH issued a proposed order concluding that the party engaged in most of the misconduct described in the notice of proposed action, and recommending that the director revoke the party’s license which had expired on 5/31/11."

Karma.


His insurance hustle schemes actually go back a good bit further.
All the way back in 2001 he was caught falsifying a customer's height (added 1") and weight (subtracted 108 lbs) on their application for short-term convalescent care insurance. Cost him a $500 penalty plus a three month suspension of his Oregon non-resident insurance agent license that time.
http://www.cbs.state.or.us/ins/admin_actions/actions_2003/producer_2003/02-09-007.pdf

Quote
Violation of ORS 746.100
Claiborne violated ORS 746.100 by engaging in the following conduct. On
or about 5/24/01, Claiborne solicited and completed an application from
Orlander L. Jenkins (Jenkins) of La Grande, Oregon, for short-termconvalescent care insurance to be provided by Bankers Life and Casualty
Company (BLCC). At the time, Jenkins’ height was 5’ 11’’ and his weight was
320 pounds. Claiborne recorded on the application that Jenkins’ height was 6’
0’’ and his weight was 212 pounds. Claiborne sent the application to BLCC.
BLCC issued the policy applied for by Jenkins based on the information in the
application. However, if BLCC had known Jenkins’ correct height and weight,
BLCC would not have issued the policy.