so when someone lists a scope in the classifieds, and those buyer gets it with a loose rattling lens, would it be appropriate for the seller to wash his hands of it by instructing the buyer to send it to the manufacture? after the seller stated publicly that three scope was "100%"? you know that would not be appropriate. as I state.d, vortex has stepped up to handle the issue, removidng cameras lands responsibility from the issue, which, for all intents and purposes used what Neil was attempting to do. maybe my Southern accent lead him to think I was some hick to be rolled on. regardless. I don't spend a lot of money so the loss of my business won't kill him, what little I do spend can go to swfa in Texas from now on. nothing but good service from them always. pass the buck to vortex. and anyone who thinks otherwise isn't capable of using their common sense.
