How about Baldwin held the gun, and pointed it at a person without verifying load status, pulled the trigger, so he’s responsible period?!?!?
What the fuque, over?
EVERYONE else might have diminished responsibility, he has absolute responsibility.
Why are you guys trying to let this self centered prick off the hook?
I'm trying to consider the whole situation, put my personal feelings about Baldwin aside, and look at the situation objectively.
That's why I'd like to read their safety protocols that were published, or supposed to be in place.
I was with you, then I started thinking, hey, do the relevant laws have "we're on a movie set" exclusions written into them???
They obviously didn't follow Hollywood movie set "best practice" or there wouldn't be two people shot (or a LOT of people would have been shot over the decades of shoot em up movies being made).
There were at least a few previous "oops" moments with firearms on the set.
Why should I think it was "reasonable" for Baldwin to not ensure the firearm wasn't loaded?
