Lots of expert legal analysis by people that are completely clueless about a)the law and liability b)movie making and c)the facts.
Who knows how this will play out.
Expert members in the armory field have joined in, why don't you enlighten us with facts.
Nobody has explained how, after two previous negligent discharges on the set, a reasonable person would trust the staff responsible for those two mishaps, take a functional firearm from them, point it at another person, and pull the trigger.
Nobody has pointed out the part of the negligent homicide or manslaughter statutes that absolve actors from their own actions.
