Yeah, OK. The whole science of ballistics is wrong, and you've got it figured out. Sure.
Ballistic science? Your quick load simulation model is nothing more than a hypothesis, until it is proven by empirical data.
Are we to believe that the 358 Win is the equivalent or superior to the 35 Whelen.
and the 7-08 is superior to the 280
and the 260 Rem is superior to the 6.5/06.
and the 25 Souper and 257 Roberts are superior to the 25/06?
Look, no one is saying that the 308 is not a good cartridge. And no one is saying that there is a huge practice difference in the field between it and the 06. What's your beef?
