Darryl, now that you have unequivocally agreed to the obvious, that a decent marksman will hit a target at 100 yards more often than one at 1500, is there any possiblity that you might carry this logic over into game shooting and admit the merest slim tiny possibility that even a wonderful LR hunter might be more likely to miss or wound an animal at 1500 than at 100? Honest, LR guys, such an admission will not cause your world to crumble, nor will it be the end of LR shooting at game. You are not giving up much to agree with reality, which is what this debate is all about. It has taken us five pages of posts to get agreement that is it is easier to hit closer targets. How many will it take to admit the same for game?
<br>
<br>Wyo, I'm not against you, nor denigrating you or your choices. You guys just don't get it. If we doubt that MK bullets are the best for big game, you reply that we are ignorant, arrogant and close minded, attacking you and the very principles of your "way". You are driving folks away.
