And if Alexander had been mentioned you would take that as proof for a later dating of the book.
You know you would.
The current Scholarly conscientious is that much of Ezekiel was written during the Babylonia exile, near in time to the events being predicted. Sure a passage making such an extraordinarily accurate claim 240 years before the event would be subject in a high level of scrutiny. After all, the more extraordinary the claim, the more extraordinary the standard of evidence.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
