If one were to assume that you are correct in making that statement, it would be correct to note that you are not there citing any statement of "superiority" - none at all. If a person explains a belief and advises you regarding consequences based on that belief,you are being informed.
When a christian tells another their life is not complete without the belief they have in God (and a burning in hell consequence for not having the same beliefs ) they are implying their choice of belief is the better one, - -
WEAK ! Now you are down to describing what a person is "implying" - pretending that you have the power to read their mind and announce their intent. What YOU feel and what YOU take upon being so informed is YOUR action, not something done by the purveyor. Why not take responsibility for your own digestion, interpretations and feelings rather than trying to lay false guilt on those who explain their own beliefs?
Believe as I do or my god will burn you forever?
That's "just sharing their beliefs".
BS. It's a cohesive threat as part of their attempts to convert the weak minded to their religion.
It's the Mafia Boss technique:
Nice afterlife you got there. It would be a shame if something were to happen and it was to go up in flames. Tell you what, I got my boy Jesus here. You give over all your beliefs to him, and I'll make sure nothing happens to it for you.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
