A S ......have you ever considered the fact that individual conceptions of God are practically endless, so it would take a lot of dialogue to understand, and then refute, each claim.?
Gene,
That's why when someone asks me to disprove a god I first ask them to define the god in question.
As an example, you have more deist tendencies, and really don't seem to care all that much what the scriptures actually say. That is a much different position the Ringmans.
It's also why I'll ask participants if they believe in a young earth. There answer will tell me a lot about where they stand on the Curdog to Ringman continuum.
Also Curdog,
Think about where you and I've been debating lately. It's this very narrow piece of grounds around the reliability of internal personal experience as evidence. You don't throw many rocks, so I have nothing to throw back.
Others are quick to impune the motives and ethics of those of different beliefs, which is often followed with a thread of eternal torture, so yes, those rocks get tossed back.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
