Originally Posted by CCCC
Originally Posted by bannination
Originally Posted by Fubarski
Originally Posted by DBT
It's not my fault that it wasn't understood.


Of course, it is.

You lack the capacity for intelligent argument.

You've posted over a thousand times, all in a lame attempt to refute the existence of God.

And you've failed miserably, as would be expected.

You cut and paste from the internet, arguments that are way over your head.

You are forced to attempt to frame the argument to put the burden of proving the existence of God on the other side, because you're not intelligent enough to produce an argument that God doesn't exist.

You're completely impotent, all of your efforts, over a thousand posts, and you've not changed one opinion.

Your 'fire career is a complete waste of time.


Hang on a minute. You can't prove a negative. It's up to you to prove an existence of god. That's now how this works. You are lacking of capacity for any kind of argument.


"You can't prove a negative" - a statement based entirely upon human opinion/rationalization - one aspect of the human-made evidence and argumentation construct. It may work just fine for humans who need rules for their intellectual games, but it has no relationship to the existence, presence and power of God. These mere human tools are not applicable to faith based beliefs. Simply wrenches for the human domain.


An absence of evidence where evidence should be found is evidence for the negative.