The name of the institution is irrelevant: it is the quality of their argument that counts.
Exactly.
And 100% of the arguments from the Discovery Institute are of the worst possible scientific quality.
Demonstrate it. Start with Signature in the Cell by Stephen Meyer, which first rate atheist philosopher praised effusively. And while you're at it, explain why the evidence convinced Antony Flew that evolution cannot possibly explain the origin of life.
Tell me about the Peer Review process for Stephen Meyer's "Signature in the Cell"??
Here's a convent index to many of your most absurd religiously motivated beliefs and why they are wrong.
