We're not distinguishing evidence you dumb [bleep], we're on the topic of logic---the logical difference between the validity of heliocentrism and Neo-Darwinism as analogies (parallels). One is an observation of present day reality. The other is not an observation of present day reality (micro-evolution is not what we're talking about) but a deduction from an a priori philosophical premise in which the evidence is dredged up from the distant past. Stop being willfully obtuse.
