Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by Ringman
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Ringman
Originally Posted by DBT
You make daily affirmations of your faith without regard to what is being said. Always focussing on the poster while studiously avoiding debate on the topic.


You and I are exactly the same. You believe what you read is factual. I have been on both side and know I am right.



I have no belief about how the universe came to be. I am questioning those who do claim to know. The two are not the same. You are equivocating.


I don't believe you. Or your are insane. You come here and argue against Christians because you don't have a belief. You need help.

He's searching for help, in proving his logic is wrong or right. He needs ratification of his belief.

Like the man on the roof of his flooding riverbottom house who refused all manner of help offered as beneath him until he drowned. He asked God why He didnt answer his prayers for help and stop the flood. HE said HE gave him help but he refused to accept it as it wasnt on his terms.


You still miss the point of justification through evidence, or the lack of it.

If there is no evidence for someone having committed a crime, it is not justified to be convinced that they in fact committed the crime.

You may or may not have grounds to suspect them of committing a crime, but that is not the same thing. You may pursue your suspicion but without evidence you have no case, or justification.