Hello again antelope_sniper, did your eyesight fail again - did you miss this reply and inquiry? Or, are you avoiding it?
Originally Posted by CCCC
Originally Posted by CCCC
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Instead of weasel worded hypotheticals about what your position might be, why won't you just plainly state it.
It looks as though you don't grasp the potentially exquisite subtleties of the subjunctive case. Too bad. So, as you suggest, here it is in your face. How do you respond to a position such as this:-"God is not interested in the futile human process and search for evidence about God, and not interested in what evidence humans do or do not find."
I missed nothing.
I called you out for the game you were playing, what you call the "exquisite subtleties" where you attempt to state a position, but claim it's not really your position, so you can play gotcha games later on.
Let me know when you are done with that tactic, and we can continue your discussion.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
