The topic in question (Why are you a Christian?) is in an open forum – nice concise logical question. Non-believers are also entitled to view the postings and are interested in the responses.
Similar to most threads involving religion, somewhere along the line a believer will make comment that their faith is based on proven facts. Non-believers politely ask them to substantiate this statement and basis of their information, out of interest. If a response is provided, the non-believers will point out that these are indeed not facts, with logical reasoning of contradictory information in cases, the more vocal believers get angry, make idle threats, and the scheissefest begins.
Why do those of “faith” argue it to be “fact” when clearly it isn’t – it’s called faith for a reason. Simple guide to the definitions: “Faith” has no proof. Facts can be proved.
I think there’s a lot of brainwashing going on – monkeys believing in ghosts teaching other monkeys to believe in ghosts.
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.
That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.
