Originally Posted by Ringman
Originally Posted by bannination
jaguartx:

I think it's great you can quote a book, but why should I believe your particular book and not someone else's?

What empirical evidence do you have that your book is for real and every other book is false -- I need this criteria before I can accept you are correct.

This is serious business because according to you I'm going to burn for eternity. Surely there is a substantial amount of criteria to determine fairy tale from reality, right?


The most documented legal historical evidence prior to the printing press is the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. Do some research.


For the sake of argument, let's say we accept your statement face value even though you failed to prove it.

The bible has plenty of incorrect historical "facts" in it. Does popularity determine truth? For being the most documented thing before the printing press, you'd think the authors wouldn't be anonymous right?