That surprises me, though. Which position do you find untenable?
I won't even get into a discussion of the worth of a politican's life vs. another human being--I disagree with you completely, but arguing the point with you won't do any good.
What's untenable is your attempt to assign some kind of rationale or justification for the gunman's selection of his victims. Because there is none.
The guy is insane, and I'm sure this will come out at trial. He had no reason to choose to kill a politician, judge, or little girl, he just wanted to kill someone.
Only an idiot would attempt to rationalize it. Or someone completely out of touch with reality.
