Watched the video but have not read the over 200 posts. A man on his own property has a right to arm himself at any time and in this case a hostile visitor was present and refusing to leave. When a struggle over a single firearm or knife happens both parties are considered armed. I was taught to retain possession of my weapon at all costs. The same right to defend a weapon goes with a private citizen as well as law enforcement. Did the homeowner/boyfriend have the right to arm himself? I would say yes. Did the visitor have the right to be there? I would say no. Were they both armed? I would say yes in that the visitor was angry and appeared stronger and actively tried to take possession of the weapon.
I sure hope that pu**y is really good because it sure has caused a lot of trouble.
Patriotism (and religion) is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
