One thing is for sure, the shooter is so much better off for introducing a gun into a non-violent confrontation, then using it on an unarmed person who was a considerable distance away.
Carruth never broke any laws.
He was forced to shoot a FELON who committed multiple felonies against him.
Why are you defending a FELON, and purposely leaving out the facts of the case as you attempt to re-write the facts with your lying?
Exactly. Just like I said. He's much better off for introducing a gun to a non-violent situation then using it on an unarmed person who was a considerable distance away!
Just think, if he hadn't retrieved the gun, the upset father may have continued to verbally vent his frustration. Nobody should have to listen that racket. Pew pew bitches!
