Originally Posted by goalie
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by deflave
Texas law is pretty clear on these issues and dad clearly advanced on the little guy.

Dad also verbalized that he would take the weapon from little guy and fugk him with it. Which would easily be interpreted as a threat of deadly force by most people.

Dad made two overt motions to grab the weapon. He was shot the second time.

Even if arrested and charged, Texas jury isn’t going to convict based on that video.


He’ll be charged. He fuqked up when he went and retrieved his weapon during a verbal argument. He became the aggressor at that point.
Luckily for the little Asswhole, he’ll have to face a Lubbock Jury and not one in Dallas or Austin.

My guess is hell be charged and tried, but found Not Guilty.


He told the guy to leave his property.

When he didn't leave, the property owner armed himself.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Well, other than he should have been armed from the start. 😉


He’d of stood a much better chance of not being charged if he had already had the gun on his person, as in having a handgun on his hip for open carry.
Which would have been perfectly legal under the TX Constitutional Carry Law.
He fuqked up by retrieving the rifle during a verbal argument, and became the aggressor at that point.


"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston
Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~