You're assuming the shooter was the legal property owner, it's not clear that he is.
As long as the place was his home, rented or owned he had a right to tell anyone to leave.
Number one, you don’t know WHO the phuq I voted for, so no reason to get personal.
Number two, as stated in above article, once boyfriend fired a shot from a gun that shouldn’t have been brought to a trespassing or verbal argument, in the first place, Dad may have thought he had good justification to try and disarm him.
“Once you have been told to leave the property and refuse, you are past mere trespassing.”
Nope. STILL, just trespassing, and NOT grounds for deadly force.
As CHL said, having a gun ALREADY on your person is one thing. Making a decision to go and RETRIEVE a gun (hidden behind a door you can LOCK), escalated this.
Sure I can't say for sure who you voted for but you are sure flying the leftrat flag with your current posts. As for your inability to grasp reality I see that as another lefty trait. CHL is wrong. If I tell someone to get off my porch or any property of mine I can threaten them, I can capture them and hold them for the cops. What you are pushing with classic leftist drivel is that property ownership means nothing and that is a communist viewpoint for sure. Why do you think it is OK for some blithering idiot to come on someones property raising hell and making threats then starting a physical incident? The guy should have just left. He got himself killed.
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/yYDjsxrQ/IMG-0124.jpg)
