Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by jwp475


LOL.
No where did the Article state that “Carruth isn’t going to jail”

What the heck did you expect his sleaze bag Lawyer to say ?

The Grand Jury will make the decision whether he’s charged for murder or not. Based on evidence and Texas Penal Code Law Justification Of Deadly Force. Not on what his Lawyer said.
You make about as much sense as ElkTurdBurglar.

He’ll be indicted. Book it. We shall see what the Jury decides.
Hopefully they’re not as obtuse as you.



You dumb azz no where did I say the article said that but if you had a brain you could deduce the obvious




Evidently Reading Comprehension is not your strong suit.
Let me make it crystal clear for ya. I highlighted the pertinent Statue in Bold Letters for ya. To make it easy for ya.

This was a case where a verbal argument turned into murder.
Where Little Man brought a gun to a verbal altercation, and by doing so, provoked the man he murdered.
Texas Penal Code is very specific If you can’t read and comprehend those statues, as provided by TX Law, there’s probably no help for you. Kinda like ElkTurdBurglar.
And another little clue for ya. It’s not LEGAL to fire a “warning shot” either. Either your Justified in use of Deadly Force or Not.
Not to mention the fact that it was none of the Little Man’s business to began with.
He and the Whore planned on provoking the Father that was there legally at the Court Appointed Time & Place to pick up his Child. Why else was the Rifle so readily available. The Whore set Little Man up to Murder her Ex. As in Premeditated.

Texas Penal Code: Justification For Use Of Deadly Force:
Subchapter C. Protection of Persons:

Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE.
(a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used:
(A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
(B) unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor's habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or
(C) was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery;
(2) did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and
(3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used.
(b) The use of force against another is not justified:
(1) in response to verbal provocation alone;


"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston
Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~