What “precedents” would those be?? Rawhide 1876?? Eastwood vs. Koreans 2002??
You can use “force” to remove trespassers in Texas, NOT “deadly force”. Otherwise, you have to show proof that arson/burglary/physical violence was about to occur or believed to have been about to occur.
The victim was KNOWN, he hadn’t threatened VIOLENCE, he hadn’t ASSAULTED anyone (other than verbally).
“Hey! I’ll just walk inside, grab a gun, and see if THAT makes the situation better!” While the ex-wife sits there, calmly on her phone, showing no concern for her safety (because she KNOWS he’s just yelling, and has a REASON to be doing so).
You're just plain dumb.
So now Read committing Assault & Battery on Carruth is not Assault & Battery. A hostile threat in your face, and then physically being thrown across the yard.....no assault.
Don't ever serve on a jury. You're too blind and dumb for the defendant to get a fair trial.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
