...In defense of your own life or anothers, deadly force is justified.
If his life had been in danger, absolutely. But it wasn't.
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by Taco2fiddy7
Wow, he's standing on his porch. That's justification to kill him? An unarmed guy who is now a safe distance away.
How many times does a property owner have to let an illegal trespasser physically assault him before it is OK to use deadly force, mind you, the property owner had already been physically assaulted twice, and your position is the property owner does not have a right yet.
So, one number. How many times does a victim need to be attacked before he/she can use deadly force?
Real simple question Limp Brain Commie.
Answer the question.....
So by your thinking, won't refer to it as logic as it isn't, if a little old lady attacks you, you can shoot her? No, sorry son, doesn't work that way. An "attack" in itself doesn't necessarily justify deadly force.
Means, motive, opportunity. You demonstrate those, you're justified.
Did the dead guy have the means to kill the shooter? Nope. Motive, sure tensions were high and both clearly weren't thinking straight. Opportunity? Nope, he was unarmed while standing on the porch while the shooter was a safe distance away.
What danger was the shooter in the moment he fired? Answer that.
You lose the debate when you refuse to provide one simple number requested, and continue with your obfuscation of the facts.
I notated the cold hard facts as they happened, and not one single commie has successfully quoted, and proven any of the facts I posted wrong, from my CASE FACTS posting a few pages back.
Nothing but steady lies, and ignoring the actual truths from you commie clowns working hard to destroy gun rights.
Obstruction of facts? You are the one ignoring all the facts. First and foremost. Why did little man stick his nose into someone else's business. This was between the kids parents. People do not stop being parents when they get divorced. This is just mistake number one. Why did the sniveling little runt go get a gun? He should have stayed in the house. Not his business. There was no threat of harm when he shot the kids dad. This was murder and you cant make it anything else. Little man is up to his neck in trouble just because he could not mind his own business. The whore did not do what the judge told her to do. She deserved an ass eating. Then drug thru court. State AG is going to crucify the runt.
Ideas are far more powerful than guns, We dont let our people have guns. Why should we let them have ideas. "Joseph Stalin"
He who has braved youths dizzy heat dreads not the frost of age.
