The father was no longer there legally after the mother and Carruth had asked him to leave. The children were not there. He could have gone where they were and picked them up.
I dont think he knew where they were. He said he sent the police to his ex-mother in laws house and his ex wife asked why? He said because that was likely where the child was. She acted like it was not, or did not indicate that child was indeed there. She said she wanted to see the child before the father picked him up, in spite of the court order. Do we really know the child was not at this house? Do we really know where the child was? Maybe more information has come out since the initial videos? I have not read the last 20 pages of this thread.
