Originally Posted by HugAJackass

Science would be better served if data was just that, data.

Hardly. You have no understanding of science if you think that. Facts are collections of details. Science is a rational understanding of that the details mean. You have missed this entirely. Back to square one with you.

Quote
Science would be better served if theories (hypothesis) remained in their part of the scientific method and not placed as the conclusion of the science.


If we are to play the semantics game, then you need to separate theories and hypotheses. They are not the same. You have much ground to cover to begin to understand what science is, never mind what it is telling us.



Save an elk, shoot a cow.