Originally Posted by Take_a_knee
Originally Posted by wswolf


So I respectfully request from the creationist camp: an argument, based on verifiably accurate evidence, that is indicicative of miraculous creation over biological evolution or any other avenue of actual science.


Do you have any idea just how moronic that question is? Most likely not, I suppose. You slime dwellers don't read much philosophy, or logic, do you?

You are making claims about reality. Why would you expect anyone to accept them as true if you refuse to provide any evidence? Please explain why asking for evidence of a claim is morinic. Use simple words that we mere slime dwellers can understand. Do you have anything to offer this discussion other than unwarranted insults?

Last edited by wswolf; 03/17/12.

One unerring mark of the love of the truth is not entertaining any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is built upon will warrant. John Locke, 1690