There is no way that the Earth is 6000 years old, so it starts from a false premise. When starting from a false premise, and with a predetermined outcome in mind (IE, creationism) and with a system of information, theory, and ongoing research as VAST and elastic as our body of scientific knowledge, I'm not surprised that there are nooks and crannies where folks can make some hay.... but it's not science.
There is no way that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old, so it starts wiht a false premise. When starting from a false premise, and with a prederimined outcome in mine (IE, evolutionism) ans with asysttem of information, theory, and ongoing researchas VAST and elasticas our body of scientific knowledte, I'm not surpirsed that there are nooks and crannies where folks can make some hay....but it's not science. It brain washing from pre-school through graduate school. It is a world view.
With what you have posted, you still have not refuted the scienctific facts I posted in the essay.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
