You bring up the audience. Forget the audience. The problem is the Ph.D biologist could not rebutt Dr. Kindell. He does have an understanding of science. He is an example of why every year dozens of Ph.D level scientists turn from evolutionism to some form of creation.
I watched a debate with Dr. Kindell in Medford. The opponent pretended to have severe chest pain. An abulance was called. Dr. Kindell answered a few questions from the audience to be polite and then went to the hospital.
His opponent had already left. The ambulance drivers were still there and told Dr. Kindell the guy was faking it and wanted a ride home. They informed him law required they deliver him to the hospitol.
Evolutionism cannot be defended from science. Dr. Kindell was "an ardent evolutionist" as he describes himself. Many years ago he told me, "Christians have two brains. One is lost and the other is out looking for it." But he continued to study science (ten fields). Science convined him he was wrong. He became a creationist. Later he becme a Christian and then a Bible believing creationist. Finally when he could find no scientific reason not to beleive God's Word ment anything other than what It states he became a firm defender of six day creation created by the God of the Bible 6,000 years ago.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
