Yes, you tried. Anyway, is there a difference in evolution and simple natural selection? I would not argue about the finches or the moths in England or the many varieties of dogs. I would call that "natural selection." Evolution in my view refers to the progression, for example; of lemur to monkey to man. Or dinosaur to bird.
I would not want to argue that with these definitions, "natural selection" proves evolution.
TF
Natural selection is one mechanism of evolution. There is one other - genetic drift.
Both undeniably happen. (undenably references only rational adults).
Lemur to monkey is not anything. Lemurs did not evolve into monkeys nor did monkeys evolve into humans. Evolutionary biology makes no such claim. Such simple concepts as common ancestors are lost by antis.
