Originally Posted by Ringman
Quote
John Stanford's book can only be considered as purposeful piece of disinformation


Only by those who refuse to see the truth that mutations go the wrong way for evoluton to work.


Perhaps John had never heard of neutral mutations, linked genes, exon and gene duplication, silencing, epigenetics or a bunch of other things that totally invalidate his argument. if he was a high school student I might believe that. but his early publication record and history show he should have known about all these things. He didn't argue them away, he just ignores them and presented an argument he knows is false, which is clearly not supported by observational or experimental data.


The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this Republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. Coolidge