John Stanford's book can only be considered as purposeful piece of disinformation
Only by those who refuse to see the truth that mutations go the wrong way for evoluton to work.
Why would you say that when clearly they do not always go "the wrong way"?
Your are FOS. Prove me wrong.
There are quite a few papers ( peer reviewed and replicated), something that John's "theories" haven't been.
Try looking this one up...
PNAS June 10, 2008 vol. 105 no. 23 7899-7906
The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this Republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. Coolidge
