Gee, thanks for your condescending and non-illuminating post...
Seems you are over sensitive to being logically quizzed on the soundness of your theories...maybe you can work on that personal issue.
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Thanks very much for suggesting I could have just as well stayed home and not wasted a bunch of bullets in actual testing, when fiddling with formulas could have saved me all that time, money and effort.
LOL...How about you first learn to read properly?, cause nowhere did I say your bullet testing was a waste, What I did say ,was, some corresponding mathematical modelling relating to your mechanical tests would give it much more credibility, especially should it closely resemble your actual physical results...its not a bad concept...a whole variety of industries from aviation, medical, to building construction use that method to review & test their designs...so I cannot see why it wouldn't be equally valuable & relevant to bullets.
-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
