When blast and recoil are the proximate cause of a shooter's poor shooting, reducing them is - in spite of your apparent claims to the contrary - a good place to start if the goal is to help the shooter improve.
You have an uncanny knack for stating the obvious. Perhaps only exceeded by your sense of discovery, which reveals your level of understanding. And by the way, I never made any "claims to the contrary," but nice try.
Your fallacy was the assumption implicit in your quote below, that hunters in general, or the hunter you were replying to choose mild-recoiling chamberings because they can't handle recoil:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Agreed, if a hunter can't shoot a gun well because of the recoil and blast.....
And it's a fallacy because the previous poster (the one you were "agreeing with") said nothing about not being able to handle recoil or muzzle blast, you're the one who added that particular spin, and you're the one who implied he couldn't handle recoil.
