The facts were posted in the original thread. I'm still waiting for one of you Mule Deer groupies to show you even know what that thread is.
Kind of tough to demonstrate a knowledge of the facts when you haven't read that thread. Personal attack is a poor substitute for rational, reasoned discussion but it is what you have to resort to when you are ignorant of the facts.
The evidence is there - read it. Demonstrate you have a clue.
Post it up.
Nope. I'm still waiting for evidence you people have a clue what you're talking about. Hard to do that if you haven't read the thread, eh?
What I will do is post the last couple of digits of the OP's first post in the thread as the bona fides I know what they are, but that will have to wait until I get home this evening. Then you can demonstrate you have a clue by providing the missing digits.
Or you can just provide a link now. That won’t prove you’ve read any of it but at least it will prove you at least know what thread we’re talking about.
Here's my evidence. Mule Deer is consistently logical, helpful, and polite. He doesn't make up stuff if he doesn't know an answer, and with a few exceptions, he doesn't engage in the Internet tomfoolery that the rest of us do. Therefore, based on my experience, I presume that he probably didn't do anything wrong. i
You on the other hand, don't get that presumption. Your posts are downright ignorant at times, to the point that I believe you have an organic brain disorder and cannot admit when you have made a mistake or are wrong.
So you can goof around and play pretend martyr all you want, but until I see otherwise, you've got a presumption of doucebaggery in my book.
