Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Starman


Its only classed as burglary if you can prove
beyond reasonable doubt that he had 'intent'
to commit robbery before entering the structure.
Not true.
Not true, and wrong on multiple levels.


take the issue up with these guys >>>>

[Ref. Lawson and Berry Law firm, Atlanta GA.]

-What Must be Proven to be Convicted-

"To convict you of burglary, the District Attorney must be able to prove
that you had the intent to commit a crime when you broke into
and entered the place. Burglary requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt
that you broke and entered with the intent to commit a felony inside.
The defendant is not guilty of burglary if he decided to commit a crime
once he was already on the property but he will be guilty of theft or another crime."




NO doubt TRH and JoeBobs experience in GA
Criminal law exceeds that of Lawson & Berry.
.. you can take that to the 24hrCampfire bank... LoL.


-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.