I think maybe you meant ‘you’re easily confused’.

We shall see soon enough.

Did the kid threaten to pull a gun on an unarmed Travis or not?

Still looking for the flattening of the curve.

This was an ‘ongoing’ thing, you know.

Originally Posted by Ejp1234
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
While we’re at it.....exactly how do you prevent brandishing a legally carried shotgun?

Put it back in the holster?

English will do the wise thing under oath, admitting his original claim of fishing equipment theft. Doesn’t prove who, but will dispel the thought he didn’t care.

You may not hear it.

The curve hasn’t even been flattened yet, more to come.

Hope the new prosecutor didn’t think they put her on the case because they liked her.



Your easily confused..... Mr English owns the property. He wasnt present, ever.... he never officially trespassed Arbery.

Potentially you could say, Perez was assigned as an agent for English. However, Perez never officially treapassed Arbery either.

However the bigger kicker to your whole confusion here to this mythical dream of them getting off for any of this.... the McMichaels had literally nothing to do with Mr. English, his property, trespassing Arbery before by rights.... they are fugged if they use that as their defense.

The McMichaels didnt own the property, they didnt work there, and they weren’t assigned to be an agent of the property by Mr. English. That makes them without knowledge of Abery’s right to be there. That means they cannot citizen arrest him. That means them brandishing a weapon in an attempt to detain him was a felony, and that means their self defense claim is bunk, and that means they murdered him.

Case closed.


"Those that think they know everything are annoying those of us that have Google." - Dr. D. Edward Wilkinson

Note to self: Never ask an old Fogey how he is doing today.
Revised note to self: Keep it short when someone asks how I am doing.