Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Ejp1234
Originally Posted by Ghostinthemachine
Oh probably not, but it gives a little insight into his 'personality'



Should people be murdered for personality?

Land of the free.....

Red herring. That's not the question. Knowledge of his disrespect for lawful authority, and quickness to rage and behave in a threatening manner is relevant to a claim that he was the aggressor in a self-defense shooting.

Again, you lose the right to claim self defense after you chase someone down with a motor vehicle and put said person in fear for his life. That makes you the aggressor.

This is not 1875 Georgia, Alabama, or Mississippi we are talking about anymore. The"jogger" is no longer required to answer "Yes Massa" or "No Massa". And folks are no longer allowed to lynch "Uppity Joggers"



Well said.


Tarquin