ColdBore, That's still an apples to oranges comparison. You compare the heaviest bullet loaded in 7-08 by remington (140gr) to a middle weight bullet for the .308 (150gr).

I'll give you credit in that you've shown fairly conclusively that for the 140-150gr. range bullets that the 7-08 is more efficient at longer ranges.

Obviously the heavy for caliber 7-08 is going to carry energy further than the lighter for caliber .308. However, if you pick a heavy for caliber bullet in .308 (180gr.) and compare it to a heavy for caliber bullet in 7-08 it paints a somewhat different picture. In this case .308 beats 7-08 at every range quite handily. It'll also belt your shoulder quite handily too.

Energy (ft-lbs)
Cartridge Type Bullet Muzzle 100 200 300 400 500
Remington� Express� 180 PSP CL 2743 2288 1896 1557 1269 1028
Remington� Express� 140 PSP CL 2542 2142 1793 1490 1228 1005

Cartridge Information
Index Number Cartridge Type Weight (grs.) Bullet Style Primer No. Ballistic Coefficient
R308W3 Remington� Express� 180 Pointed Soft Point Core-Lokt� 9 1/2 0.383
R7M081 Remington� Express� 140 Pointed Soft Point Core-Lokt� 9 1/2 0.390

Notice that the ballistic Coefficients are very close 0.383 in .308 and 0.390 in 7-08. This number is what determines how fast a given caliber will shed velocity and energy as it travels down range.

The 7-08 is more powerful than the .308 at 100 yards and beyond in the 140-150gr. range. However, For a given load of similar ballistic coefficient, the .308 is more powerful out to 500 yards than the 7-08, but the difference is negligible after 300 yards. I'm not even touching the difference in momentum between the two cartridges...


Freedom isn't free. I'd rather pay for it with vigilance than with blood.