Use of a particular CAD tool by an industry has a lot of history behind it, and investment, more than just what is the best current tool for a particular job.
Perhaps the stubbornness of sticking to an archaic tool, as well as the depreciation of the investment should both be considered paid in full.
Not that I won't survey with a transit and chain if given a chance, I also know that my interest there is purely recreational and not a means of generating revenue, or an adequate product.
Business is business.
Figure any officer of a consulting firm should know that...
