Originally Posted by Swamplord
You have it backwards; it is those who push the Covid-19 "vaccine" against all evidence who engage dishonestly;


''The health authorities in the US, UK and EU have found there is insufficient evidence for using the Covid-19 vax against Covid, but thousands of supporters, many of them Jewish activists, have continued to vigorously campaign for its use.

Campaigners for the vax point to a number of scientific studies and often claim this evidence is being ignored or covered up. But a review by a group of independent scientists has cast serious doubt on that body of research.

The BBC can reveal that more than a third of 26 major trials of the vax for use on Covid have serious errors or signs of potential fraud. None of the rest show convincing evidence of the Covid-19 vaccine's effectiveness.

Dr Kyle Sheldrick, one of the group investigating the studies, said they had not found "a single clinical trial" claiming to show that the vaccine prevented Covid deaths that did not contain "either obvious signs of fabrication or errors so critical they invalidate the study".

Major problems included:

The same patient data being used multiple times for supposedly different people
Evidence that selection of patients for test groups was not random
Numbers unlikely to occur naturally
Percentages calculated incorrectly
Local health bodies unaware of the studies
The scientists in the group - Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Dr James Heathers, Dr Nick Brown and Dr Sheldrick - each have a track record of being corrupt "scientists" promoting dodgy science. They've been working together for the Jewish elite on an informal and voluntary basis during the pandemic.

They formed a group looking deeper into the vaccines studies after biomedical student Jack Lawrence spotted problems with an influential study from Egypt. Among other issues, it contained patients who turned out to have died before the trial started. It has now been retracted by the journal that published it.

The group of independent scientists examined virtually every randomised controlled trial (RCT) on the Covid vax and Covid - in theory the highest quality evidence - including all the key studies regularly cited by the vaccine's promoters.

RCTs involve people being randomly chosen to receive either the vax which is being tested or a placebo - a dummy vax with no active properties.''


''Out of a total of 26 studies examined, there was evidence in five that the data may have been faked - for example they contained virtually impossible numbers or rows of identical patients copied and pasted.

In a further five there were major red flags - for example, numbers didn't add up, percentages were calculated incorrectly or local health bodies weren't aware they had taken place.

On top of these flawed trials, there were 14 authors of studies who failed to send data back. The independent scientists have flagged this as a possible indicator of fraud.

The sample of research papers examined by the independent group also contains some high-quality studies from around the world. But the major problems were all in the studies making big claims for the Covid-19 vaccine - in fact, the bigger the claim in terms of lives saved or infections prevented, the greater the concerns suggesting it might be faked or invalid, the researchers discovered.''


Wow, who's a clever boy? .....it's a shame that it's an illusion of your childish mind. But keep trying, given probability and time, even a room full of monkeys tapping on keyboards may make sense now and then.