Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by RayF
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
TONS of strong evidence has been posted on here supporting Evolution.
It is a done deal and because it is science it will continually be reinforced.

Misappropriation of science. “Evidence” is a suggestion that is not conclusive, therefore, it is not a “...done deal.”


Scientists don't agree. Evolution has withstood testing for over a hundred and fifty years. Theory lies in explaining how it works, not that it does work, which is proven.


Then why are so many high-level intellects abandoning it? Why do scientists like Michael Denton call it a "theory in crisis"? Given that the odds of protein folding are impossible how can fully naturalistic processes account for this essential step in neo-Darwinian evolution?



A theory in crisis? I'm not aware of that. A very small percentage may be making that claim for their own reasons, but that's not a crisis.