Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by RayF
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
TONS of strong evidence has been posted on here supporting Evolution.
It is a done deal and because it is science it will continually be reinforced.

Misappropriation of science. “Evidence” is a suggestion that is not conclusive, therefore, it is not a “...done deal.”


Scientists don't agree. Evolution has withstood testing for over a hundred and fifty years. Theory lies in explaining how it works, not that it does work, which is proven.


Then why are so many high-level intellects abandoning it? Why do scientists like Michael Denton call it a "theory in crisis"? Given that the odds of protein folding are impossible how can fully naturalistic processes account for this essential step in neo-Darwinian evolution?



A theory in crisis? I'm not aware of that. A very small percentage may be making that claim for their own reasons, but that's not a crisis.


The theory is indeed in crisis if the arguments of its critics cannot be met.

Tarquin