Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by antlers
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Actually, considered in toto, such evidence shows that the standard (neo-darwinian) model cannot possibly be true. Its adherents cling to it out of religious necessity, not because it is empirically defensible.
Oh really? And how is that?
AS, debating with an adamant non-believer in evolution is just as fruitless as debating with an adamant non-believer in God. 😄
IDK, debating believers had bore much fruit for me. Many are very good, like minded men who just happen to disagree with me on a single proposition. Despite this disagreement, we often come to the same solutions for the real problems facing us today. Ultimately, that's what these discussion are about. What matters regarding the real problems of today.
At a practical level, I have way more in common with you than any Marxist who also happens to be an atheist.
word

Good talk AS.

Every day on this side of the ground is a win.