Originally Posted by Ringman
You implied it.
lol

No. Not at all.

I said...
Originally Posted by antlers
It’s a common misinterpretation of evolution to think that humans were lineally descended from existing species of apes. Some people think that a fossil ape-man or man-ape seems necessary in order to ‘prove’ evolution. Today it is widely recognized that the relationship of modern humans to the present species of apes is through common ancestors ‘rather’ than through direct descent.
And you said...
Originally Posted by Ringman
I heard an evolutionist in lecture say something like, "If we could find the common ancestor of man and ape it would look like an ape."
Then I responded...
Originally Posted by antlers
That’s contrary to the scientific consensus.
In other words, what you claimed to hear an evolutionist say in a lecture is ‘not’ in general agreement with the huge body of knowledge held by science regarding evolution.

Clear as day. No ‘implication’ at all.

Every day on this side of the ground is a win.